Member-only story

Covert Conflict in International Politics: Princeton Studies in International Relations

Carlos Drummond

·2.9k Followers· Follow

Published in Secret Wars: Covert Conflict In International Politics (Princeton Studies In International History And Politics 168)

6 min read

781 View Claps

40 Respond

Save

Listen

Covert conflict is a form of political warfare that involves the use of clandestine or deceptive methods to achieve strategic objectives. It differs from overt conflict, which is characterized by the open use of military force or diplomatic pressure. Covert conflict can take many forms, including espionage, sabotage, assassination, and terrorism. It is often used by governments to pursue their foreign policy goals without risking direct confrontation with their adversaries.

The use of covert conflict has a long history in international politics. In ancient times, spies and assassins were used to gather intelligence and eliminate political opponents. In the modern era, covert action has become a sophisticated tool of statecraft, with governments employing a wide range of techniques to achieve their goals.

Covert conflict can take many different forms, depending on the objectives of the actors involved. Some of the most common forms of covert conflict include:

Secret Wars: Covert Conflict in International Politics (Princeton Studies in International History and Politics 168)

Secret Wars: Covert Conflict in International Politics (Princeton Studies in International History and Politics Book 168)

4.9 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	4219 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	336 pages

Espionage: The gathering of intelligence about an adversary's plans and capabilities. Espionage can be conducted through a variety of means, including human intelligence (HUMINT),signals intelligence (SIGINT),and imagery intelligence (IMINT).
Sabotage: The destruction or disruption of an adversary's infrastructure or resources. Sabotage can be used to cripple an enemy's economy, military, or government.
Assassination: The targeted killing of an individual. Assassination is often used to eliminate political opponents or to send a message of intimidation.
Terrorism: The use of violence or the threat of violence to achieve political goals. Terrorism can be used to coerce governments, intimidate populations, or disrupt economic activity.
Unconventional warfare: The use of irregular military forces to conduct operations behind enemy lines. Unconventional warfare can be used to harass enemy forces, gather intelligence, or sabotage enemy infrastructure.
Hybrid warfare: A combination of conventional and unconventional warfare tactics. Hybrid warfare is often used to blur the lines between war and peace, and to make it difficult for adversaries to respond effectively.
Gray zone conflict: A type of conflict that falls below the threshold of war but is more intense than traditional competition. Gray zone conflict can involve a variety of activities, including cyberattacks, economic coercion, and political warfare.

There are a number of factors that can contribute to the use of covert conflict in international politics. These factors include:

The desire to avoid direct confrontation: Covert conflict can be used to achieve strategic objectives without risking direct military confrontation. This can be important for governments that are concerned about the potential costs and risks of war.
The need for plausible deniability: Covert conflict can provide governments with a degree of plausible deniability. This can be important for governments that want to avoid being held accountable for their actions.
The lack of other options: Covert conflict may be the only option available to governments that are facing a powerful adversary or that are operating in a difficult environment.

The use of covert conflict has a number of implications for international politics. These implications include:

The erosion of sovereignty: Covert conflict can erode the sovereignty of states by undermining their ability to control their own territory and affairs.
The undermining of diplomacy: Covert conflict can undermine diplomacy by making it difficult for governments to trust each other.
The increase in global instability: Covert conflict can increase global instability by creating tensions between states and by making it more difficult to resolve conflicts peacefully.

The use of covert conflict poses a number of ethical and legal dilemmas. These dilemmas include:

The question of legality: The legality of covert conflict is a complex issue. There is no clear consensus on what constitutes covert conflict, and the laws governing its use are often ambiguous.
The question of morality: The use of covert conflict can raise moral questions. For example, is it ethical to use assassination to eliminate a political opponent?
The question of accountability: The use of covert conflict can make it difficult to hold governments accountable for their actions. This can be a problem if governments use covert conflict to commit human rights abuses or other illegal acts.

Covert conflict is a complex and controversial issue. It is a tool of statecraft that can be used to achieve strategic objectives without risking direct confrontation. However, the use of covert conflict also poses a number of risks, including the erosion of sovereignty, the undermining of diplomacy, and the increase in global instability. The ethical and legal dilemmas associated with covert conflict make it a difficult issue to resolve.

Secret Wars: Covert Conflict in International Politics (Princeton Studies in International History and Politics Book 168)

4.9 out of 5